Dinner and a Casebook

because, as a culture, we've officially run out of legal culinary puns

Archive for the tag “potatoes”

tortillas de patatas & employment discrimination

1000723_10201408739354506_1634545283_n

This is not a great photo for our time, but it’s smittenkitchen’s updated tortilla de patatas (halved– and it halves nicely). The tomato is a Japanese black Trifele tomato.

Petrosino v. Bell Atlantic, 385 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2004). An employee appealed the decision against her in her TItle VII employment discrimination claim, saying that while normally a Title VII claim requires you to apply formally for the position you want, her employer didn’t generally use formal applications to determine who got which position. The court held that this was insufficient so long as the option was actually available to her to apply informally for a specific position and not just to say “I want to be promoted”.

“Certainly, the rule is not inflexible. The law recognizes that “the facts of a particular case” may sometimes make “a specific application a quixotic requirement.” Id. But the exception is narrow and does not pertain simply because an employee asserts that an “aura of discrimination” in the workplace somehow discouraged her from filing a formal application. Id. Rather, to be excused from the specific application requirement, an employee must demonstrate that (1) the vacancy at issue was not posted, and (2) the employee either had (a) no knowledge of the vacancy before it was filled or (b) attempted to apply for it through informal procedures endorsed by the employer.”

collard greens & subject matter jurisdiction

Sauteed Collard Greens as per Del Zimmerman on Epicurious and roasted potatoes with thyme, salt, and pepper. Egg fried in the leftover oil from the collard greens!

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering and Manufacturing, 545 U.S. 308 (2005). I was really hoping to start with something interesting to someone not a lawyer, but no dice. The issue is what kinds of claims can be brought into federal court, specifically whether a state claim which can be resolved only by solely federal analysis should be removed or not.

“The Court [in Merrell Dow] saw the missing cause of action not as a missing federal door key, always required, but as a missing welcome mat, required in the circumstances…”

Post Navigation